4.8 Article

Transcriptome Reveals the Rice Response to Elevated Free Air CO2 Concentration and TiO2 Nanoparticles

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 20, Pages 11714-11724

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02182

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41571130061, 21876083, 31261140364]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20161404]
  3. International S & T Cooperation Program of China [2010DFA22770]
  4. Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX3-SW-440]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing CO2 levels are speculated to change the effects of engineered nanomaterials in soil and on plant growth. How plants will respond to a combination of elevated CO2 and nanomaterials stress has rarely been investigated, and the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. Here, we conducted a field experiment to investigate the rice (Oryza TiO2, 0 and 200 mg kg(-1)) using a free-air CO2 enrichment system with different CO2 levels (ambient similar to 370 mu mol mol(-1) and elevated similar to 570 mu mol mol(-1)). The results showed that elevated CO2 or nano-TiO2 alone did not significantly affect rice chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activities. However, in the presence of nano-TiO2, elevated CO2 significantly enhanced the rice height, shoot biomass, and panicle biomass (by 9.4%, 12.8%, and 15.8%, respectively). Furthermore, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis revealed that genes involved in photosynthesis were up-regulated while most genes associated with secondary metabolite biosynthesis were down-regulated in combination-treated rice. This indicated that elevated CO2 and nano-TiO2 might stimulate rice growth by adjusting resource allocation between photosynthesis and metabolism. This study provides novel insights into rice responses to increasing contamination under climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available