4.8 Article

Revealing the Mechanisms of Polyethylene Microplastics Affecting Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 16, Pages 9604-9613

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02971

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Recruitment Program of Global Experts
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578391, 51608374, 51538008]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016KJ012]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation [PCRRK18007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyethylene (PE) microplastics retained in sewage sludge inevitably enter the anaerobic digestion system. To date, no information has been reported on the mechanisms of PE microplastics affecting anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS). This study evaluated the mechanisms using batch and continuous tests. Short exposure to PE microplastics at lower levels (i.e., 10, 30, and 60 particles/g-TS) did not significantly affect the methane production, but higher levels of PE micro plastics (i.e., 100 and 200 particles/g TS) significantly (P = 0.006 and 0.0003) decreased methane production by 12.4-27.5%, with a lower methane potential and hydrolysis coefficient. In continuous test over 130 days, feeding WAS with 200 particles PE microplastics/g TS decreased vs destruction by up to 27.3% (P = 2.18 x 10(-18)) and resulted in a 9.1% (P = 0.002) increase in the volume of digested sludge for disposal. Correspondingly, the microbial community was shifted in the direction against anaerobic digestion. A mechanisms study revealed that the negative effect of PE microplastics was likely attributed to the induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) rather than the released acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate. The generation of ROS caused a 7.6-15.4% reduction of cell viability, thereby restraining sludge hydrolysis, acidification, and methanogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available