4.7 Article

Biomarker responses in oysters Crassostrea hongkongensis in relation to metal contamination patterns in the Pearl River Estuary, southern China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 251, Issue -, Pages 264-276

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.140

Keywords

Pearl river estuary; Oysters; Metal pollution; Biomarker responses

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory in Marine Pollution
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21777134]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Pearl River Estuary (PRE) is the third largest estuary in China, where estuarine organisms are under metal stress at various biological levels. Based on the metal concentrations measured in oyster Crassostrea hongkongensis, we documented a change in dominance of metal contamination from Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Zn to Ag, Cd, Cu and Zn. In general, metal concentrations were higher in upstream stations and displayed a clear up-downstream gradient. Compared to the historical values, we noted the reductions in Cd, Cr and Ni concentrations, and the changing inputs due to evolving industrial activities were responsible for shaping the metal contamination profile in the PRE region. Along with metal concentrations, a suite of biomarkers was analyzed. Among the metals measured in the oyster tissues, Ag, Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn showed the strongest associations with pro-oxidant and oxidative stress responses (superoxide dismutase, lipid peroxidation and lysosomal membrane destabilization) and detoxification responses (glutathione and metallothionein), suggesting that the present metal contamination still exerts significant amount of stress in biota in the PRE. Metal contamination in estuaries in China is still severe compared to other countries, therefore continuous efforts should be taken to monitor the changing metal profiles with necessary control and remediation measures. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available