4.7 Article

Teamwork-oriented integrated modeling method for geo-problem solving

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 111-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.015

Keywords

Integrated modeling; Teamwork-oriented modeling; Conceptual model; Logical model; Computational model; Workflow

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41701441]
  2. NSF for Excellent Young Scholars of China [41622108]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB954103]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [164320H116]
  5. outstanding innovation team in colleges and universities in Jiangsu province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, studies on constructing integrated modeling solutions in a web-based environment primarily focus on the chaining of different model-services, while the flow of exploring solutions for complex geo-problems - geographically distributed issues - has been less studied. To address this gap, a teamwork-oriented integrated modeling approach to supporting geo-problem solving based on the collaborative work of different modelers is proposed in this article, with a workflow from conceptual, logical, and finally, computational modeling. In this approach, conceptual, logical and computational models are discussed and constructed using a graph-based method, a flowchart-based method and a service-configuration-based method, respectively. By building the corresponding repositories for managing and comparing different versions of conceptual-logical-computational models, dispersed modelers can propose their own ideas and explore appropriate solutions based on existing modeling resources. A prototype modeling system was established, and two experimental modeling cases were conducted to verify the feasibility and capability of the proposed approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available