4.7 Article

Gradient tree boosting machine learning on predicting the failure modes of the RC panels under impact loads

Journal

ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 597-608

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-019-00842-w

Keywords

Impact loading; Reinforced concrete; Local damage; Machine learning; XGboost; Gradient boosting

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1C1B5086385] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a new approach using machine learning to predict local damage of RC panels under impact loading, providing a new pathway for predicting structural behavior despite lower accuracy than expected.
This paper proposed a new approach in predicting the local damage of reinforced concrete (RC) panels under impact loading using gradient boosting machine learning (GBML), one of the most powerful techniques in machine learning. A number of experimental data on the impact test of RC panels were collected for training and testing of the proposed model. With the lack of test data due to the high cost and complexity of the structural behavior of the panel under impact loading, it was a challenge to predict the failure mode accurately. To overcome this challenge, this study proposed a machine-learning model that uses a robust technique to solve the problem with a minimal amount of resources. Although the accuracy of the prediction result was not as high as expected due to the lack of data and the unbalance experimental output features, this paper provided a new approach that may alternatively replace the conventional method in predicting the failure mode of RC panel under impact loading. This approach is also expected to be widely used for predicting the structural behavior of component and structures under complex and extreme loads.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available