4.7 Article

Length scale and mesh bias sensitivity of phase-field models for brittle and cohesive fracture

Journal

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106532

Keywords

Phase-field theory; Variational approach to fracture; Mesh bias; Length scale; Quasi-brittle fracture; PF-CZM

Categories

Funding

  1. Monash Graduate Scholarship
  2. Monash International Tuition Scholarship
  3. Australian Research Council via DECRA project [DE160100577]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678246, 51878294]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science [2018ZC04]
  6. Funding for Central Universities [2018PY20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Being able to seamlessly deal with complex crack patterns like branching, merging and even fragmentation, phase-field models (PFMs) are promising in the computational modeling of fracture of solids. There are, however, some unclear issues such as (i) are phase-field models mesh-bias objective? and (ii) what value should be selected for the length scale parameter? This manuscript provides answers to these practical questions. Three popular PFMs for brittle and cohesive fracture in the literature are selected, implemented within a single code and used to study the sensitivity to the length scale parameter and the mesh alignment of the solutions to various brittle and quasi-brittle fracture problems with/without singularities and notches. The findings are useful to researchers and engineers who need to perform fracture simulations using a phase-field model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available