Journal
ENERGY
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages 599-605Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.105
Keywords
Waste heat recovery quality; Waste heat recovery efforts; Waste-heat recovery costs; Channel selection; Stackelberg gamey model
Categories
Funding
- Guangzhou Philosophy and Social Science Development Program [2019GZYB71]
- Guangzhou Technological Innovation and Development Special Fund Project [201904010403]
- Guangdong Industry Polytechnic Program [JG201820]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Recovering wasted heat is sustainable and cost-effective approach to secure energy supply in cities. This paper extended the Stackelberg game model to investigating the supply chain of the waste heat recovery market. Three models were proposed to investigate the optimal decision-making for different supply chain participants. With a validation case, the results suggested that the joint decision can reach the optimal outcomes and cost. Mobile heating strategy has advantages over coal-fired boilers, electric boilers, natural gas boilers in terms of costs and environmental protection. With a typical consumption of the recovered waste heat 342 GJ/day for water heating (from 25 degrees C to 60 degrees C) can save 11.672t standard coal and 79,800 RMB per day. In addition, improving thermal energy quality of waste heat recovery can generate higher profit and attract more potential customers. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available