Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.On scale-dependent cosmic shear systematic effects
T. D. Kitching et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2016)
Generalized shear-ratio tests: A new relation between cosmological distances, and a diagnostic for a redshift-dependent multiplicative bias in shear measurements
Peter Schneider
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS (2016)
The DES Science Verification weak lensing shear catalogues
M. Jarvis et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2016)
Generalized shear-ratio tests: A new relation between cosmological distances, and a diagnostic for a redshift-dependent multiplicative bias in shear measurements
Peter Schneider
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS (2016)
Constraining multiplicative bias in CFHTLenS weak lensing shear data
Jia Liu et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2016)
Gravitational lensing analysis of the Kilo-Degree Survey
Konrad Kuijken et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2015)
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Martin Kilbinger
REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS (2015)
PROPERTIES OF WEAK LENSING CLUSTERS DETECTED ON HYPER SUPRIME-CAM's 2.3 deg2 FIELD
Satoshi Miyazaki et al.
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL (2015)
3D cosmic shear: cosmology from CFHTLenS
T. D. Kitching et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2014)
Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)
Richard Massey et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2013)
Defining a weak lensing experiment in space
Mark Cropper et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2013)
Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys - III. Application to the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey
L. Miller et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2013)
CFHTLenS: combined probe cosmological model comparison using 2D weak gravitational lensing
Martin Kilbinger et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2013)
CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing cosmological parameter constraints: Mitigating the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignments
Catherine Heymans et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2013)
Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing
P. Melchior et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2012)
CFHTLenS: the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey
Catherine Heymans et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2012)
Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements
Alexandre Refregier et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2012)
CFHTLenS: improving the quality of photometric redshifts with precision photometry
H. Hildebrandt et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2012)
Magnification as a tool in weak lensing
Alberto Vallinotto et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2011)
Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients
Gary M. Bernstein
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2010)
Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys - II. Application to simulations
T. D. Kitching et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2008)
Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys - I. Methodology and a fast-fitting algorithm
L. Miller et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2007)
Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix
J. Hartlap et al.
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS (2007)
The Shear Testing Programme - I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
C Heymans et al.
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (2006)
Weak gravitational lensing
M Bartelmann et al.
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS (2001)
Bayesian photometric redshift estimation
N Benítez
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL (2000)
Share Paper
