4.5 Article

DELAYED 131-I FIRST TREATMENT AFTER SURGERY HAS NO IMPACT ON THE MEDIAN TERM OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE RISK DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CANCER

Journal

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 58-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.4158/EP-2019-0182

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministero dell' Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR) [PRIN 2015HPMLFY]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In intermediate risk (IR) differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients, selective use of radioiodine (131-I) for remnant ablation and/or as adjuvant therapy (RRA) is advocated. The recently suggested postoperative evaluation could delay the use of RRA. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a delayed RRA can worsen the clinical outcome of IR-DTC patients. Methods: Four hundred and fourteen consecutive IR-DTC patients were divided according to the time elapsed from surgery to RRA, <6 months (group A, 186/414 [44.9%]), or >= 6 months (group B, 228/414 [55.1%]). Clinical and biochemical data were collected, and clinical outcome was analyzed at the first evaluation (EV) after RRA (first-EV) and after a median of 6 years of follow-up (last-EV). Results: No difference in the clinical outcome of group A and B was found. Since a different activity of 131-I could have an impact on the outcome, we separately analyzed the groups according to the 131-I activity (low-activity group: 1,110 MIN/30 mCi [n = 320], and high-activity group: 3,700 MBq/100 mCi [n = 94]), further subdivided according to the time elapsed from surgery to RRA. No major differences were found in both the low- and high-activity groups when comparing the features of their subgroups A and B, as far as in their clinical outcome. Conclusion: The time elapsed between surgery and the first 131-I treatment does not influence the clinical outcome of IR-DTC patients. This finding allows a more relaxed attitude in the decision making process whether to perform the RRA in IR-DTC cases in which a selective use of 131-I is recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available