4.7 Article

CDK4/6 inhibition mitigates stem cell damage in a novel model for taxane-induced alopecia

Journal

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201911031

Keywords

chemotherapy; hair loss; palbociclib; taxol; taxotere

Funding

  1. NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (Inflammatory Hair Diseases Programme)
  2. MRC DTP Research Experience Placement at the University of Manchester
  3. SEI Learning Through Research at the University of Manchester
  4. MBChB APEP at the University of Manchester

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Taxanes are a leading cause of severe and often permanent chemotherapy-induced alopecia. As the underlying pathobiology of taxane chemotherapy-induced alopecia remains poorly understood, we investigated how paclitaxel and docetaxel damage human scalp hair follicles in a clinically relevant ex vivo organ culture model. Paclitaxel and docetaxel induced massive mitotic defects and apoptosis in transit amplifying hair matrix keratinocytes and within epithelial stem/progenitor cell-rich outer root sheath compartments, including within Keratin 15+ cell populations, thus implicating direct damage to stem/progenitor cells as an explanation for the severity and permanence of taxane chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Moreover, by administering the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, we show that transit amplifying and stem/progenitor cells can be protected from paclitaxel cytotoxicity through G1 arrest, without premature catagen induction and additional hair follicle damage. Thus, the current study elucidates the pathobiology of taxane chemotherapy-induced alopecia, highlights the paramount importance of epithelial stem/progenitor cell-protective therapy in taxane-based oncotherapy, and provides preclinical proof-of-principle in a healthy human (mini-) organ that G1 arrest therapy can limit taxane-induced tissue damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available