4.8 Editorial Material

Nomenclature for cellular plasticity: are the terms as plastic as the cells themselves?

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 38, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019103148

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK078803, DK068471, DK094989, DK105129, DK110406, DK083355]
  2. Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center/Barnes Jewish Hospital Foundation Cancer Frontier Fund
  3. NIH National Cancer Institute [P30CA091842]
  4. Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
  5. Keystone Symposia Director's Fund
  6. Keystone Symposia Future of Science Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is now recognized that cell identity is more fluid, and tissues more plastic, than previously thought. The plasticity of cells is relevant to diverse fields, most notably developmental and stem cell biology, regenerative medicine, and cancer biology. To date, a comprehensive and uniform nomenclature to define distinct cell states and their injury-induced interconversions has been elusive. The first Keystone Symposium devoted exclusively to cellular plasticity in regeneration and tumorigenesis was held on January 2019 in Keystone, Colorado, and featured a workshop on terminology in the cell plasticity field. Definitions for terms such as plasticity, de- and transdifferentiation, reversion, and paligenosis were discussed. Here, we summarize the content and tenor of the symposium and nomenclature-focused workshop with regard to terms in the field. We outline the challenges with current definitions and recommend best practices and approaches to developing an accurate and acceptable nomenclature in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available