4.7 Article

Magma extraction pressures and the architecture of volcanic plumbing systems

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 522, Issue -, Pages 118-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.020

Keywords

Mush Model; magma extraction; rhyolite-MELTS; silicic magmas; rhyolite

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-1151337]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The deposits of large volcanic eruptions provide the sole record of the architecture of magmatic plumbing systems in the moments when large pools of crystal-poor, eruptible magma are present in the crust. It is widely accepted that silicic magmas form by segregation of melt-rich, crystal-poor magma from a crystal-rich source; however, the depths at which segregation takes place and the distribution of the magma within the crust are not well constrained. We present a new approach to calculate pressures at which crystal-poor, eruptible magma is extracted from a crystal-rich source (i.e. mush). We apply the approach to a sequence of large (>50 km(3)) eruptions from the Taupo Volcanic Zone (TVZ), New Zealand, which were part of a volcanic flare-up. We compare the calculated extraction pressures with pre-eruptive storage pressures for the same units. Our results show that storage and extraction pressures do not always coincide. Instead, eruptible magma can be completely segregated from the crystal-rich source, and stored at shallower levels in the crust prior to eruption. In the case of the TVZ flare-up, repeated input of material and heat - probably coupled with tectonic extension - gradually conditioned the crust and allowed extraction of eruptible magma over a growing range of pressures with time. Our approach has the potential to reveal important information on the structure and distribution of magmatic systems within the shallow crust. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available