4.0 Article

The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) and its successor, APOGEE-2

Journal

ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN
Volume 337, Issue 8-9, Pages 863-870

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201612387

Keywords

Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; Galaxy: stellar content; Galaxy: evolution; Galaxy: structure

Funding

  1. SDSS-IV
  2. NSF [AST 1312863]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  6. University of Arizona
  7. Brazilian Participation Group
  8. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  9. Carnegie Mellon University
  10. University of Florida
  11. French Participation Group
  12. German Participation Group
  13. Harvard University
  14. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  15. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  16. Johns Hopkins University
  17. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  18. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  19. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  20. New Mexico State University
  21. New York University
  22. Ohio State University
  23. Pennsylvania State University
  24. University of Portsmouth
  25. Princeton University
  26. Spanish Participation Group
  27. University of Tokyo
  28. University of Utah
  29. Vanderbilt University
  30. University of Virginia
  31. University of Washington
  32. Yale University
  33. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  34. Carnegie Institution for Science
  35. Chilean Participation Group
  36. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  37. Instituto de Astrofsica de Canarias
  38. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  39. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  40. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  41. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  42. Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  43. National Astronomical Observatory of China
  44. University of Notre Dame
  45. Observatorio Nacional/MCTI
  46. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  47. United Kingdom Participation Group
  48. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  49. University of Colorado Boulder
  50. University of Oxford
  51. University of Wisconsin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) of Sloan Digital Sky Survey III (SDSS-III) has produced a large catalog of high resolution (R = 22 500), high quality (S/N > 100), infrared (H-band) spectra for stars throughout all stellar populations of the Milky Way, including in regions veiled by significant dust opacity. APOGEE's half million spectra collected on > 163 000 unique stars, with time series information via repeat visits to each star, are being applied to numerous problems in stellar populations, Galactic astronomy, and stellar astrophysics. From among the early results of the APOGEE project - which span from measurements of Galactic dynamics, to multi-element chemical maps of the disk and bulge, new views of the interstellar medium, explorations of stellar companions, the chemistry of star clusters, and the discovery of rare stellar species - I highlight a few results that demonstrate APOGEE's unique ability to sample and characterize the Galactic disk and bulge. Plans are now under way for an even more ambitious successor to APOGEE: the six-year, dual-hemisphere APOGEE-2 project. Both phases of APOGEE feature a strong focus on targets having asteroseismological measurements from either Kepler or CoRoT, from which it is possible to derive relatively precise stellar ages. The combined APOGEE and APOGEE-2 databases of stellar chemistry, dynamics and ages constitute an unusually comprehensive, systematic and homogeneous resource for constraining models of Galactic evolution. (C) 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available