4.4 Review

Outcomes measures in children after acute central nervous system infections and malaria

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 756-762

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000823

Keywords

cerebral malaria; encephalitis; meningitis; outcome assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Neurology at Boston Children's Hospital
  2. Department of Neurology at Children's National Health System
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Acute central nervous system (CNS) infections in children result in significant mortality and neurologic morbidity worldwide. This article summarizes the recent pediatric literature published on outcomes measures used after acute infectious meningitis, encephalitis, and cerebral malaria, and highlights ongoing research efforts to standardize outcomes measurements. Search terms were geared toward functional, cognitive, behavioral, and other outcome assessments. Recent findings Recent data suggest that, depending on microbiological cause, there are differences in currently used outcome measures following acute CNS infections. Outcomes assessments include a variety of formal psychological tests (structured interviews and neuropsychological tests of cognitive and motor functioning) and dichotomized or ordinal scales. Standardization of outcome measures, however, is lacking. Global efforts to standardize outcomes that encompass both the child and family are ongoing. Summary Centers worldwide can track and measure a variety of cognitive, behavioral, and functional outcomes after acute CNS infections. Standardized documentation and coding of clinically important outcomes is needed. Further research to evaluate effective practices using acute adjunctive and rehabilitation therapies will be aided by outcome measure standardization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available