4.7 Article

Damage monitoring of masonry structure under in-situ uniaxial compression test using acoustic emission parameters

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages 812-822

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.192

Keywords

Masonry structure; Acoustic emission; In-situ uniaxial compression; b-Value; Rate process theory; Damage variable

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778587, 51808510]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province of China [162300410255]
  3. Foundation for University Young Key Teacher by Henan Province [2017GGJS005]
  4. Outstanding Young Talent Research Fund of Zhengzhou University [1421322059]
  5. Science and technology planning project of Transportation in Henan Province [2016Y2-2, 2018J3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural health monitoring of masonry structures is an ongoing engineering challenge. An innovative method for establishing a database corresponding to the parameter characteristics of acoustic emission (AE) signals and the damage information was proposed. Therefore, it is necessary and important to study the AE parameter characteristics of masonry structures. In this study, the in-situ uniaxial compression test with the AE monitoring for masonry specimen was performed. The damage evolution of masonry was analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by the characteristics of several typical AE parameters. Results indicated that the variation characteristics of AE ringing counts and peak frequency were more consistent with the final brittle failure of masonry specimen. Furthermore, the relationship between AE cumulative events and stress level of masonry material was studied. A linear relationship between AE cumulative events and damage variable was established to assess damage degree of masonry quantitatively. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available