4.7 Article

Dynamic and static testing methods for shear modulus of oriented strand board

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 216, Issue -, Pages 542-551

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.004

Keywords

Oriented strand board; Shear modulus; Mode shape coefficient; Dynamic test; Static square-plate torsional test

Funding

  1. 2016 Platform of Significant Innovation in Strategic Emerging Industries and Public Service [SCJ[2016]221]
  2. Nanjing Forestry University [NLZZYQ201804]
  3. 2017 Jiangsu Province Forestry Science and Technology Innovation and Extension Fund [LYKJ[2017]41]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a new dynamic and a new static method for testing shear modulus of oriented strand board (OSB) are proposed, respectively. ANSYS software was used to calculate the mode shape coefficient of the OSB free plate and cantilever plate specimens, and the relationship of the mode shape coefficient depending on the length-to-width and the width-to-thickness ratios of the plate specimen was given. According to the stress and strain analysis of static torsion of the square plate, the principle of static square-plate torsional test for testing the shear modulus of orthotropic materials was described and the scheme of pasting the strain gauges in the direction of +/- 45 degrees was proposed to ensure the accuracy of testing static shear modulus of OSB. The correctness of the new method for dynamically testing OSB shear modulus was verified by static square-plate torsional test. The longitudinal elastic modulus E-x, transverse elastic modulus E-y, elastic modulus in the 45 degrees direction E-45 degrees, shear modulus in the plane G(xy) and shear modulus in the 45 degrees direction G(45 degrees) were measured dynamically. The measured results of E-x/E-y = 2.88 and G(45 degrees) < G(xy) for OSB indicate that the orthotropy of OSB cannot be simply dealt with as a unidirectional composite. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available