4.7 Article

An experimental study on the fracture of a unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced composite under quasistatic torsion

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages 547-554

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.080

Keywords

Carbon fiber; Polymer-matrix composites; Fracture; Mechanical properties; Torsion

Funding

  1. Vermont NASA EPSCoR [NNX13AB35A, NNX14AN20A]
  2. University of Vermont clean energy fund [028613]
  3. Vermont Venture Innovation fund [031365]
  4. National Science Foundation in the Major Research Instrumentation Program [1429252]
  5. Vermont Technical College, Taif University
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1429252] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon fiber-reinforced composites exhibit excellent mechanical properties for a variety of applications. Using the spirally notched specimens, we demonstrate how unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced polymeric composite specimens with different fiber orientations fail under quasistatic torsion. By collecting data at 200,000 points per second, type I specimens exhibited limited fluctuations at the fiber-matrix interfaces before the catastrophic failure, whereas type II specimens exhibited stepwise failure after the peak loads with torque avalanches described by Gaussian models. Distinctive crack-tip stress contours and energy release rates were obtained through the finite element modeling using anisotropic elastic properties of the unidirectional composite. The fractographic characterization showed that the primary failure of type I specimens occurred along fiber-matrix interfaces, whereas circular cracks switched between polymeric matrices and fiber-matrix interfaces when type II specimens failed progressively. Our findings could help further insights on the mechanical behavior of different fiber-reinforced composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available