4.7 Article

Mechanical behaviors and equivalent configuration of a polyurea under wide strain rate range

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110923

Keywords

Hopkinson bar; Polyurea; Strain rate; Strain hardening coefficient

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11602202, 11732012, 11602201]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2018JQ1040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The tension tests are systematically conducted on a polyurea by Instron and split Hopkinson tension bar apparatuses for strain rate ranging from 0.0001 s(-1) to-3000 s(-1), to investigate its mechanical behaviors. It is found that the polyurea presents a high rate-dependent, and the stress strain curves share a similar mechanical trend and consistent strain hardening coefficient trend under wide loading strain rates. The interrupted experiments are designed, and the results demonstrate that the polyurea is sensitive to temperature, which induces distinct softening influence on flow stress. However, the strain hardening coefficient is sharing the same trends and little influenced by the strain rate and adiabatic heating. The equivalent mechanical configuration is investigated by using the two-dimension unit cell model to simulate the polyurea mechanical characteristics. The systematical simulation results facilitate to outline its equivalent configuration: the soft phase dispersing in the hard network matrix. Furthermore, the matrix play a major role in the overall mechanical properties of polyurea. The configuration is further evidenced by the deduced data from reference. Finally, a simple analytical model is proposed with two components, and well capable of describing the mechanical characteristics including large strain behavior, strain rate effect and induced thermal softening effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available