4.7 Article

High Risk of Influenza Virus Infection Among Swine Workers: Examining a Dynamic Cohort in China

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages 622-629

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz865

Keywords

influenza A virus; swine influenza; zoonoses; epidemiology

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01AI108993-01A1]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH [UL1TR002553]
  3. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research [UL1TR002553]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773494, 81402730, 81621005]
  5. Beijing Science and Technology Nova Program [Z171100001117088]
  6. State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity [SKLPBS1819]
  7. China Mega-Project on Infectious Disease Prevention [2017ZX10303401-006]
  8. Program of International Science and Technology Cooperation of China [2013DFA30800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. China is thought to be a hotspot for zoonotic influenza virus emergence, yet there have been few prospective studies examining the occupational risks of such infections. Methods. We present the first 2 years of data collected from a 5-year, prospective, cohort study of swine-exposed and -unexposed participants at 6 swine farms in China. We conducted serological and virological surveillance to examine evidence for swine influenza A virus infection in humans. Results. Of the 658 participants (521 swine-exposed and 137 swine-unexposed), 207 (31.5%) seroconverted against at least 1 swine influenza virus subtype (swine H1N1 or H3N2). Swine-exposed participants' microneutralization titers, especially those enrolled at confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs), were higher against the swine H1N1 virus than were other participants at 12 and 24 months. Despite elevated titers, among the 187 study subjects for whom we had complete follow-up, participants working at swine CAFOs had significantly greater odds of seroconverting against both the swine H1N1 (odds ratio [OR] 19.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.55-358.65) and swine H3N2 (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.16-8.01) viruses, compared to unexposed and non-CAFO swine workers with less intense swine exposure. Conclusions. While some of the observed increased risk against swine viruses may have been explained by exposure to human influenza strains, study data suggest that even with elevated preexisting antibodies, swine-exposed workers were at high risk of infection with enzootic swine influenza A viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available