4.6 Article

Effect of flexibility on unsteady aerodynamics forces of a purely plunging airfoil

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 88-101

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2019.08.002

Keywords

Aerodynamic forces; Flexibility; Fluid structure interaction; Low Reynolds number; Plunging airfoil; Self-propulsion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11672022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introducing flexibility into the design of a vertically flapping wing is an effective way to enhance its aerodynamic performance. As less previous studies on the aerodynamics of vertically flapping flexible wings focused on the lift generated in a wide range of angle of attack.a 2D numerical simulation of a purely plunging flexible airfoil is employed using a loose fluid-structure interaction method. The aerodynamics of a fully flexible airfoil are firstly studied with the flexibility and angle of attack. To verify whether an airfoil could get aerodynamic benefit from the change in structure, partially flexible airfoil with rigid leading edge and flexible trailing edge were further considered. Results show that flexibility could always reduce airfoil drag while lift and lift efficiency both peak at moderate flexibility. When freestream velocity is constant, lift is maximized at a high angle of attack about 40 degrees while this optimal angle of attack reduces to 15 degrees in drag-balanced status. The airfoil drag reduction, lift augmentation as well as efficiency enhancement mainly attribute to the passive pitching other than the camber deformation. Partially deformed airfoil with the longest length of moderate flexible trailing edge can achieve the highest lift. This study may provide some guidance in the wing design of Micro Air Vehicle (MAV). (C) 2019 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available