4.4 Article

TESTING AND DEFENDING METHODS AGAINST DOS ATTACK IN STATE ESTIMATION

Journal

ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 1295-1305

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.1441

Keywords

State estimation; DoS attack; intrusion detection; packet coding

Funding

  1. NSFC [61503147, 61602272, 61403155, 71401060]
  2. University Science Research General Project of Jiangsu Province [15KJB510002]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y16F030011]
  4. Science and Technology project of Jiangsu Province [BC2015166]
  5. Prospective Joint Research of University-Industry Cooperation of Jiangsu [BY2016056-02]
  6. Lianyungang Science and Technology Projects [CG1413, CG1501, CK1503]
  7. Jiangsu Overseas Research & Training Program for University Prominent Young & Middle-aged Teachers and Presidents
  8. open research project of the State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries [PAL-N201507]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we consider a state estimation problem. In this problem, a sensor measures the state of a linear discrete-time system and sends measurements to an estimator via a packet-dropping communication link. We are concerned with the effect of Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks on stability of the estimation system, and particularly focus on how to examine whether the communication channel is under DoS attack or not as well as how to defend accordingly, if defense is possible. We formulate the detection problem as a hypothesis testing problem provided that the statistics of the communication channel is known a priori. Two defense countermeasures are proposed: one of which uses a secured packet coding approach to partly compensate the previous packet loss; and in the other the sensor's transmission power is raised to resist the jamming effect brought by the DoS attack. Simulations are provided to demonstrate the main results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available