4.8 Article

Cobalt-Tungsten Bimetallic Carbide Nanoparticles as Efficient Catalytic Material for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Journal

CHEMSUSCHEM
Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages 4866-4873

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201901736

Keywords

batteries; catalytic membrane; Co3W3C bimetallic carbide; lithium-sulfur batteries; modified separator

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51662029, 21363015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are promising candidates for next-generation energy storage devices owing to their advantages such as high theoretical specific capacity and energy density. However, the shuttle effect of polysulfide intermediates and the slow electrochemical kinetics have a severe passive effect on the cycling stability and rate performance. A Co3W3C@C composite was prepared through a simple one-pot pyrolysis method and used as a modifying layer on a commercial separator. The obtained modified separator not only prevented the shuttle effect through both strong chemical interaction and a physical barrier toward polysulfides, but also acted as a catalytic membrane to catalyze the electrochemical redox of active sulfur species. By employing the coated separator, the cathode with 60 wt % sulfur delivered a high initial capacity of 1345 mAh g(-1) at 0.1 A g(-1), excellent rate performance with a high capacity of 670 mAh g(-1) even at 7 A g(-1), and outstanding cycle performance with a low decay rate of 0.06 % per cycle and an average Coulombic efficiency of 99.3 % within 500 cycles at 1 A g(-1). Even at a sulfur loading of 3 mg cm(-1), a high initial capacity of 869 mAh g(-1) and 632 mAh g(-1) after 200 cycles at 1 A g(-1) were obtained. The results demonstrate the advantages of Co-W bimetallic carbide in preventing the shuttle effect and promoting the redox kinetics for high performance Li-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available