4.7 Article

Enhanced immobilization of chromium(VI) in soil using sulfidated zero-valent iron

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages 370-376

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.132

Keywords

Soil contamination; Heavy metal; Sulfidation; Magnetic separation; Zerovalent iron

Funding

  1. Research Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [17DZ1202203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [51608431, 21876129, 21777117, 21522704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Batch tests were conducted in this study to evaluate the influence of sulfidation on the remediation of Cr(VI) in soil by zero-valent iron (ZVI). It was demonstrated that sulfidated ZVI synthesized by ball milling with elemental sulfur (S-ZVI(bm)) could reduce and immobilize Cr(VI) in soil more rapidly and efficiently than unamended ZVI (ZVI(bm)). Specifically, with the optimal S/Fe molar ratio of 0.05 and ZVI dosage of 5 wt%, S-ZVI(bm) could completely sequestrate water soluble Cr(VI) (as high as 17.5 mg/L) within 3 h, while negligible Cr(VI) was reduced by ZVI(bm) over a 3-day incubation period under identical conditions. Furthermore, sequential extraction analysis revealed that S-ZVI(bm) treatment also promoted the conversion of exchangeable Cr to more stable forms (i.e., mainly as Fe-Mn oxides bound fraction). XPS analysis showed that reduction was the main Cr(VI) remediation mechanism by ZVI, and alkaline extraction experiments further demonstrated Cr(VI) concentration in soil could be decreased from 153.6 mg/kg to 23.4 and 131.6 mg/kg by S-ZVI(bm) and ZVI(bm), respectively. A magnetic separation process was introduced in this study to physically remove the residual ZVI particles and attached iron (hydr) oxides so as to minimize the re-release risk of immobilized Cr. Results revealed that, 71-89% of the added Fe and 9.5-33.6% of Cr could be retrieved from S-ZVI(bm)-treated soil. These findings highlighted the potential of S-ZVI(bm) as a promising amendment for immobilizing Cr(VI) in soil and the potential of magnetic separation as an alternative option for preventing the re-mobilization of sequestered Cr. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available