4.5 Article

Optimization of LpxC Inhibitors for Antibacterial Activity and Cardiovascular Safety

Journal

CHEMMEDCHEM
Volume 14, Issue 16, Pages 1560-1572

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201900287

Keywords

amines; antibiotics; inhibitors; LpxC; prodrugs; Pseudomonas; zwitterions

Funding

  1. US Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Department of Defense [HDTRA107C0079]
  2. Military Medical Research and Development Program, Defense Health Program, Department of Defense [W81XWH122000040]
  3. US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN272201500009C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UDP-3-O-(R-3-hydroxymyristoyl)-N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase (LpxC) is a Zn2+ deacetylase that is essential for the survival of most pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria. ACHN-975 (N-((S)-3-amino-1-(hydroxyamino)-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-4-(((1R,2R)-2-(hydroxymethyl)cyclopropyl)buta-1,3-diyn-1-yl)benzamide) was the first LpxC inhibitor to reach human clinical testing and was discovered to have a dose-limiting cardiovascular toxicity of transient hypotension without compensatory tachycardia. Herein we report the effort beyond ACHN-975 to discover LpxC inhibitors optimized for enzyme potency, antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics, and cardiovascular safety. Based on its overall profile, compound 26 (LPXC-516, (S)-N-(2-(hydroxyamino)-1-(3-methoxy-1,1-dioxidothietan-3-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-(6-hydroxyhexa-1,3-diyn-1-yl)benzamide) was chosen for further development. A phosphate prodrug of 26 was developed that provided a solubility of >30 mg mL(-1) for parenteral administration and conversion into the active drug with a t(1/2) of approximately two minutes. Unexpectedly, and despite our optimization efforts, the prodrug of 26 still possesses a therapeutic window insufficient to support further clinical development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available