4.6 Article

Highly Dispersed and Small-Sized Nickel(II) Hydroxide Co-Catalyst Prepared by Photodeposition for Hydrogen Production

Journal

CHEMISTRY-AN ASIAN JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 23, Pages 4193-4200

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asia.201901217

Keywords

hydrogen generation; nickel; photocatalysis; photodeposition; water splitting

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676123, 21575052]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20161127]
  3. National First-class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology [JUFSTR20180301]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51623A]
  5. Opening Foundation of Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Clean Production of Fine Chemicals from Shandong Normal University [ZDSYS-KF201504]
  6. MOE & SAFEA for the 111 Project [B13025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photodeposition has been widely used as a mild and efficient synthetic method to deposit co-catalysts. It is also worth studying how to synthesize non-noble metal photocatalysts with uniform dispersion. Different synthetic conditions in photodeposition have a certain influence on particle size distribution and photocatalytic activity. Therefore, we designed experiments to prepare the inexpensive composite photocatalyst Ni(OH)(2)/g-C3N4 by photodeposition. The Ni(OH)(2) co-catalysts disperse uniformly with particle sizes of about 10 nm. The photocatalytic hydrogen production rate of Ni(OH)(2)/g-C3N4 reached about 19 mmol g(-1) h(-1), with the Ni(OH)(2) deposition amount about 1.57 %. During 16 h stability testing, the rate of hydrogen production did not decrease significantly. The composite catalyst also revealed a good hydrogen production performance under sunlight. The Ni(OH)(2) co-catalyst enhanced the separation ability of photogenerated carriers, which was proved by surface photovoltage and fluorescence analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available