4.4 Review

The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome: a Task Force Paper

Journal

CEREBELLUM
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 102-125

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-019-01068-8

Keywords

Cerebellum; Cognition; Emotion; Affect; Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome; Schmahmann syndrome

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente) [-] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Italian Ministry of Instruction, University and Research (MIUR) [RM11715C7E67E525] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIH HHS [NS105839, R21DC014087, R15MH106957] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIH-NINDS [-] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS105839] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Ricerca Finalizzata of the Italian Ministry of Health [RF-2011-02348213] Funding Source: Medline
  7. Strategic Research Program [SRP15] Funding Source: Medline
  8. MINDlink Foundation [-] Funding Source: Medline
  9. Ataxia Telangiectasia Children's Project [-] Funding Source: Medline
  10. National Ataxia Foundation [-] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sporadically advocated over the last two centuries, a cerebellar role in cognition and affect has been rigorously established in the past few decades. In the clinical domain, such progress is epitomized by the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) or Schmahmann syndrome. Introduced in the late 1990s, CCAS reflects a constellation of cerebellar-induced sequelae, comprising deficits in executive function, visuospatial cognition, emotion-affect, and language, over and above speech. The CCAS thus offers excellent grounds to investigate the functional topography of the cerebellum, and, ultimately, illustrate the precise mechanisms by which the cerebellum modulates cognition and affect. The primary objective of this task force paper is thus to stimulate further research in this area. After providing an up-to-date overview of the fundamental findings on cerebellar neurocognition, the paper substantiates the concept of CCAS with recent evidence from different scientific angles, promotes awareness of the CCAS as a clinical entity, and examines our current insight into the therapeutic options available. The paper finally identifies topics of divergence and outstanding questions for further research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available