4.7 Article

Improving the stability and bioactivity of micro-arc oxidized calcium phosphate/titania porous coatings by high energy shot peening pretreatment

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 2041-2048

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.183

Keywords

Titanium; Micro-arc oxidation; High-energy shot peening; Coating stability; Bioactivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81701016, 81870810, 31700827]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department [Y201533871]
  3. Wenzhou Public Welfare Science and Technology Project [Y20160142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) is one of the conventional methods for surface modification of titanium (Ti)-based dental materials. However, in the process of MAO, the surface porous titania (TiO2) coating is prone to microcrack, which affects the stability of coating and the long-term service life of the implant. In this work, high-energy shot peening (HESP) pretreatment would be used to improve the stability and bioactivity of the MAO coatings and increase the effective doping of calcium and phosphorus (Ca & P) elements in surfaces. We verified that the MAO specimens pretreated by HESP (S-MAO) had larger pore size (similar to 4.0 mu m), coating thickness (similar to 8.5 mu m) and critical load (similar to 11.1 N) than the samples without pretreatment (MAO, similar to 3.1 mu m, 6.2 mu m & 6.2 N); and the content of Ca and P in S-MAO group (Ca: similar to 6.3 wt%; P: similar to 9.4 wt%) was higher than that of MAO group (Ca: similar to 5.8 wt%; P: similar to 6.7 wt%. Meanwhile, it was also proved that compared with Ti and MAO groups, MC3T3-E1 cells on S-MAO substrates had better spreading, viability, ALP activity, and osteogenic gene expression. All the above results indicate that the HESP pretreatment has excellent potential to improve the coating stability and bioactivity of MAO-treated substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available