4.7 Review

A review on the optical characterization of V2O5 micro-nanostructures

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 45, Issue 13, Pages 15781-15798

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.339

Keywords

V2O5 micro-nanostructures; Optical characterization of V2O5 micro-nanostructures; Photoluminescence of V2O5; Photo-degradation of V2O5

Funding

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education [2009-0093818]
  3. NRF [NRF 2015R1D1A1A0106581]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bulk V2O5 is a diamagnetic semiconductor with a band gap (E-g) of about 2.3 eV, which is based on the ionic configuration with filled O2p and unoccupied V3d orbitals. However, the band edge absorption and photoluminescence (PL) peak positions of low-dimensional V2O5 materials do not coincide and are distributed over wide ranges of 0.75-3.49 eV and 0.73-3.3 eV, respectively. This review summarizes the fabrication processes, structure, and optical characterization of V2O5 micro-nanostructures, including OD, 1D, 2D, and 3D morphologies. The wide ranges of band edge absorption and broad PL of V2O5 micro-nanostructures are clarified in terms of factors such as the morphology, synthesis method, growth conditions, crystal size, micro-nano size, phase transition, and measurement conditions. The relations among the separation, diffusion, recombination, and degradation of the electron-hole pairs in V2O5 micro-nanostructures are also discussed. Fundamental understanding of the optical characteristics plays a key role in V2O5 micro-nano device applications. The review also demonstrates the role of V2O5 micro-nanostructures and other materials (MOs) in V2O5/OMs heterostructures for slowing down recombination, prolonging lifetime, improving electron-hole separation, and increasing photocurrent to enhance the photocatalytic activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available