4.7 Article

Effects of Al/Na and heat treatment on the structure and properties of glass ceramics from molten blast furnace slag

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 13692-13700

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.064

Keywords

Molten blast furnace slag; Al/Na; Flexural strength; Orthogonal experiment

Funding

  1. National Key Technologies RD Program [2016YF80601304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glass ceramics with different Al/Na molar ratio from blast furnace slag were prepared using conventional melting-casting method. The structure and properties of glasses or glass ceramics were investigated by DSC, Raman, MAS NMR, XRD, and SEM. The DSC results indicated that the thermal stability (Delta T = T-c-T-g) and crystallization temperature (T-c) of the parent glass firstly increased and then decreased when Al/Na exceeded 1.21. The Raman and M-27 MAS NMR spectra analysis revealed that [AlO6] increased positively with Al2O3/Na2O. The calculation of Q(n) ([SiO4] units with bridging oxygen atoms number of n) suggested an obvious decline of (Q(0) + Q(2))/(Q(1) + Q(3)) and that [SiO4] mainly existed in the form of Q(1) when Al/Na exceeded 1.21, which accorded closely with T, variation. The crystallization results determined by XRD showed that as Al/Na increased, the main crystal phase was transformed from akermanite to gehlenite and nepheline disappeared. Glass ceramics with Al/Na of 1.48 nucleated at 780 degrees C for 2 h and crystallized at 880 degrees C for 3 h exhibited the maximum value of flexural strength. Orthogonal experiment (L9(3(4))) were carried out to investigated the optimum heat treatment of glass ceramics with a Al/Na of 1.48. The analyses indicated that nucleation time variation has little influence on the flexural strength, and the optimum heat treatment was determined as 760 degrees C - 1 h-900 - 1 h and the flexural strength was characterized as 81.310 MPa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available