4.5 Article

Virulence and pathogenicity of a Candida albicans mutant with reduced filamentation

Journal

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cmi.13103

Keywords

cisplatin; DNA polymerase; DNA replication; drug resistance; metacaspase; necrosis; Pol eta; pyroptosis; RAD30

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board [EMR-2016-000640]
  2. Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology [BT/PR15470/MED/29/997/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deletion of DNA polymerase eta (Rad30/Pol eta) in pathogenic yeast Candida albicans is known to reduce filamentation induced by serum, ultraviolet, and cisplatin. Because nonfilamentous C. albicans is widely accepted as avirulent form, here we explored the virulence and pathogenicity of a rad30 Delta strain of C. albicans in cell-based and animal systems. Flow cytometry of cocultured fungal and differentiated macrophage cells revealed that comparatively higher percentage of macrophages was associated with the wild-type than rad30 Delta cells. In contrast, higher number of Pol eta-deficient C. albicans adhered per macrophage membrane. Imaging flow cytometry showed that the wild-type C. albicans developed hyphae after phagocytosis that caused necrotic death of macrophages to evade their clearance. Conversely, phagosomes kill the fungal cells as estimated by increased metacaspase activity in wild-type C. albicans. Despite the morphological differences, both wild-type and rad30 increment C. albicans were virulent with a varying degree of pathogenicity in mice models. Notably, mice with Th1 immunity were comparatively less susceptible to systemic fungal infection than Th2 type. Thus, our study clearly suggests that the modes of interaction of morphologically different C. albicans strains with the host immune cells are diverged, and host genetic background and several other attributing factors of the fungus could additionally determine their virulence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available