4.7 Article

NHEJ-Mediated Repair of CRISPR-Cas9-Induced DNA Breaks Efficiently Corrects Mutations in HSPCs from Patients with Fanconi Anemia

Journal

CELL STEM CELL
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 607-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.08.016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia, Comercio y Competitividad y Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) [SAF2015-68073-R, SAF2015-64152-R, RTI2018097125-B-I00]
  2. 7th Framework Program European Commission [HEALTHF5-2012-305421]
  3. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad [EC11/060, EC11/550]
  4. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III [RD12/0019/0023]
  5. ICREA-Academia program
  6. Rocket Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  7. Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer (AECC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is the preferred mechanism used by hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to repair double-stranded DNA breaks and is particularly increased in cells deficient in the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway. Here, we show feasible correction of compromised functional phenotypes in hematopoietic cells from multiple FA complementation groups, including FA-A, FA-C, FA-D1, and FA-D2. NHEJ-mediated repair of targeted CRISPR-Cas9-induced DNA breaks generated compensatory insertions and deletions that restore the coding frame of the mutated gene. NHEJ-mediated editing efficacy was initially verified in FA lymphoblastic cell lines and then in primary FA patient-derived CD34(+) cells, which showed marked proliferative advantage and phenotypic correction both in vitro and after transplantation. Importantly, and in contrast to homologous directed repair, NHEJ efficiently targeted primitive human HSCs, indicating that NHEJ editing approaches may constitute a sound alternative for editing self-renewing human HSCs and consequently for treatment of FA and other monogenic diseases affecting the hematopoietic system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available