4.7 Article

Strengths and weaknesses of the aniline-blue method used to test mushroom (1→3)-β-D-glucans obtained by microwave-assisted extractions

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages 135-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.051

Keywords

Microwave-assisted extraction; Mushrooms; (1 -> 3)-beta-D-glucans; Polysaccharides; Fluorimetric assay; MAE

Funding

  1. national R+D program from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2014-56211-R]
  2. Community of Madrid, Spain [S2013/ABI-2728]
  3. Brazilian funding agency CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  4. Brazilian funding agency CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  5. Brazilian funding agency Fundacao Araucaria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The parameters to extract polysaccharide-enriched fractions (PEF) from mushrooms using MAE (microwave-assisted extraction) were adjusted following a full factorial 3(2) experimental design. The highest yield and total carbohydrate values, using Lentinula edodes as model mushroom, were obtained at 180 degrees C and 30 min. Several mushroom species were submitted to MAE and their PEF yields ranged between 12.1-44.2%. (1 -> 3)-beta-Glucans determination using a conventional fluorimetric method changed depending on the standard utilized. NMR analyses of PEF indicated that the presence of other polysaccharides in the extracts or their specific folding, might impair the proper determination of (1 -> 3) linkages by the fluorophore. Mushrooms from Cantharellales order contained (1 -> 3)-beta-glucans but they were not detected with the fluorimetric method. Therefore, although the method (after adjustments) was sensitive enough to detect their presence in many mushroom extracts, it cannot be used for all species and it is also not recommended for quantitative determinations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available