4.2 Article

Influence of resistant cultivars and crop intervals on clubroot of canola

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 99, Issue 6, Pages 862-872

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjps-2019-0018

Keywords

Brassica napus; canola; clubroot; crop rotation

Funding

  1. Alberta Crop Industry Development Fund
  2. Western Grains Research Foundation
  3. Canola Agronomic Research Program (Alberta Canola)
  4. Canola Agronomic Research Program (Manitoba Canola Growers Association)
  5. Canola Agronomic Research Program (SaskCanola)
  6. Canola Agronomic Research Program (Canola Council of Canada)
  7. Canola Science Cluster of the Growing Forward 2 Program (Canola Council of Canada)
  8. Canola Science Cluster of the Growing Forward 2 Program (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clubroot, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae, is an important constraint on canola (Brassica napus) production in Canada. Rotations of clubroot-resistant (CR) canola cultivars in various sequences and planting intervals between canola with non-host crops and fallow periods were evaluated to determine their effects on clubroot severity and P. brassicae resting spore populations under field and micro-plot conditions. Under micro-plot conditions, the rotation sequences including CR canola, continuous fallow, and the non-host barley reduced gall weight by 63%-100% and clubroot severity by 34%-100% compared with continuous planting of susceptible canola. No visible clubroot symptoms developed following continuous fallow or the non-host crop. Under field conditions, clubroot severity was very high (78% disease index) in the continuous susceptible canola sequence. Most of the CR canola rotation sequences significantly reduced clubroot severity by 12%-23%, but continuous fallow, continuous barley, and alternating the CR canola cultivars '45H29' or '73-47' with 'TC72429-10' reduced clubroot severity by 32%-36%. A comparison of intervals between canola crops and four cropping sequences (continuous susceptible canola, alternating canola with barley or pea, a 2-yr non-host interval between canola crops, and a 3-yr non-host interval between canola crops) was conducted over 5 yr. A 2- or 3-yr non-host interval improved plant height, plant biomass, and seed yield, and reduced gall mass, P. brassicae propagules in the soil, and clubroot severity. A significant yield increase of more than 3600% was observed in a 3-yr non-host interval.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available