4.6 Article

Long-term follow-up of the AVOD randomized trial of antibiotic avoidance in uncomplicated diverticulitis

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 106, Issue 11, Pages 1542-1548

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11239

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. County of Vastmanland
  2. Uppsala-Orebro Regional Research Council, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The aim of this study was to assess the long-term results in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis who had participated in the Antibiotics in Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis (AVOD) RCT, which randomized patients with CT-verified left-sided acute uncomplicated diverticulitis to management without or with antibiotics. Methods The medical records of patients who had participated in the AVOD trial were reviewed for long-term results such as recurrences, complications and surgery. Quality-of-life questionnaires (EQ-5D (TM)) were sent to patients, who were also contacted by telephone. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis of clinical outcomes. Results A total of 556 of the 623 patients (89 center dot 2 per cent) were followed up for a median of 11 years. There were no differences between the no-antibiotic and antibiotic group in recurrences (both 31 center dot 3 per cent; P = 0 center dot 986), complications (4 center dot 4 versus 5 center dot 0 per cent; P = 0 center dot 737), surgery for diverticulitis (6 center dot 2 versus 7 center dot 1 per cent; P = 0 center dot 719) or colorectal cancer (0 center dot 4 versus 2 center dot 1 per cent; P = 0 center dot 061). The response rate for the EQ-5D (TM) was 52 center dot 8 versus 45 center dot 2 per cent respectively (P = 0 center dot 030), and no differences were found between the two groups in any of the measured dimensions. Conclusion Antibiotic avoidance for uncomplicated diverticulitis is safe in the long term.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available