4.5 Article

EASIX and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 553-561

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0703-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [PE 1450/7-1, TL820.8-1]
  2. Deutsche Krebshilfe [70113519]
  3. Wilhelm-Sander-Stiftung [2016.077.1, 2014.150.1, CA 78902, CA 18029, CA 15704, HL 122173]
  4. EU [306240]
  5. Jose Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung [11R2016, 03 R/2019]
  6. Monika-Kutzner-Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is an effective immunotherapy in patients with hematological malignancies. Endothelial dysfunction was linked to major complications after alloSCT. We asked the question if the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX; [(creatinine x LDH) divided by thrombocytes]) can predict mortality after alloSCT. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in five alloSCT centers in the USA and Germany. EASIX was assessed prior to conditioning (EASIX-pre) and correlated with mortality in 755 patients of a training cohort in multivariable models. The predictive model established in the training cohort was validated in 1267 adult allo-recipients. Increasing EASIX-pre predicted lower overall survival (OS) after alloSCT, and successful model validation was achieved for the validation cohort. We found that EASIX-pre predicts OS irrespective of established scores. Moreover, EASIX-pre was also a significant prognostic factor for transplant-associated microangiopathy. Finally, EASIX-pre correlated with biomarkers of endothelial homeostasis such as CXCL8, interleukin-18, and insulin-like-growth-factor-1 serum levels. This study establishes EASIX-pre based on a standard laboratory biomarker panel as a predictor of individual risk of mortality after alloSCT independently from established clinical criteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available