4.8 Review

Genetic voltage indicators

Journal

BMC BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12915-019-0682-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [1644405]
  2. NEI [DP1EY024503, R01EY011787]
  3. NIMH [R01MH115900]
  4. NINDS [R01NS110422]
  5. US Army Research Laboratory
  6. US Army Research Office [W911NF-12-1-0594]
  7. Pew Charitable Trust
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1644405] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a holy grail of neuroscience, optical imaging of membrane potential could enable high resolution measurements of spiking and synaptic activity in neuronal populations. This has been partly achieved using organic voltage-sensitive dyes in vitro, or in invertebrate preparations yet unspecific staining has prevented single-cell resolution measurements from mammalian preparations in vivo. The development of genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) and chemogenetic sensors has enabled targeting voltage indicators to plasma membranes and selective neuronal populations. Here, we review recent advances in the design and use of genetic voltage indicators and discuss advantages and disadvantages of three classes of them. Although genetic voltage indicators could revolutionize neuroscience, there are still significant challenges, particularly two-photon performance. To overcome them may require cross-disciplinary collaborations, team effort, and sustained support by large-scale research initiatives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available