4.6 Article

Improvement of baculovirus as protein expression vector and as biopesticide by CRISPR/Cas9 editing

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 116, Issue 11, Pages 2823-2833

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.27139

Keywords

baculovirus; CRISPR; Cas9; genome editing; knock-in; knockout; nucleopolyhedrovirus

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion y Universidades [AGL2014-57752-C2-2R]
  2. H2020 European Research Council [724519]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system-associated Cas9 endonuclease is a molecular tool that enables specific sequence editing with high efficiency. In this study, we have explored the use of CRISPR/Cas9 system for the engineering of baculovirus. We have shown that the delivering of Cas9-single guide RNA ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex with or without DNA repair template into Sf21 insect cells through lipofection might be efficient to produce knockouts as well as knock-ins into the baculovirus. To evaluate potential application of our CRISPR/Cas9 method to improve baculovirus as protein expression vector and as biopesticide, we attempted to knockout several genes from a recombinant AcMNPV form used in the baculovirus expression system as well as in a natural occurring viral isolate from the same virus. We have additionally confirmed the adaptation of this methodology for the generation of viral knock-ins in specific regions of the viral genome. Analysis of the generated mutants revealed that the editing efficiency and the type of changes was variable but relatively high. Depending on the targeted gene, the editing rate ranged from 10% to 40%. This study established the first report revealing the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing in baculovirus, contributing to the engineering of baculovirus as a protein expression vector as well as a biological control agent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available