4.7 Article

Evaluation of selected electric infrared emitters for tomato peeling

Journal

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages 90-100

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.06.006

Keywords

Electric infrared emitter; Emissive power; Tomato peeling; Peeling performance; Radiant efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of selected electric infrared (IR) emitters with different emissive powers was investigated examining tomato heating rate, peeling performance and final product quality. Four types of electric emitters, including ceramic full trough element (CFTE), pillared quartz element (PQE), quartz tungsten medium (QTM), and quartz halogen medium (QHM), were selected based on their ability to produce high emissive power with appropriate range of wavelengths. The electric emitters were tested to heat the tomato cultivar Hz 6410 for peeling, using a prototype IR heating system under similar conditions. The electric emitters attained high surface temperatures (602-825 degrees C) and emissive powers (27 -37 kW m(-2)). High emissive powers of these electric emitters increased the heating rate of tomato, resulting in a high peeling performance and product quality in significant short times (<= 25 s). Among all the studied emitters, PQE with the highest surface temperature (825 degrees C) and emissive power (37 kW m(-2)) took 10 s to heat the tomatoes to the degree that they had excellent peeling easiness while meeting the USDA peelability standard. However, tomatoes experienced undesirable skin burns when the heating time was too long at high emissive powers. The study provided valuable information about the suitability of different electric emitter with the IR wavelength spectrum (2.6-3.3 mu m) for tomato peeling application. (C) 2019 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available