4.7 Article

Ammonia emissions and mitigation from a concrete yard used by cattle

Journal

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages 181-189

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.06.007

Keywords

Ammonia volatilisation; Urine; Dung; Concrete yards; Mitigation

Funding

  1. Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine [13 S 430]
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/000I0320] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Livestock excreta deposition on concrete farmyards has been identified as an important source of ammonia (NH3) emissions from agriculture. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of urine application rate and four cleaning strategies on NH3 emissions from excreta deposited on a concrete yard. Three experiments were conducted on a concrete yard over a three week period in August 2016. Experiment 1 consisted of 1 kg dung applied with either (i) 0.67 l urine (1:0.67), (ii) 1 l urine (1:1) or (iii) 2 l urine (1:2). In experiments 2 and 3 the treatments were (i) non cleaned control, (ii) cleaned after 1 h and (iii) cleaned after 3 h. The cleaning method in experiment 2 and 3 was pressure washing and scraping, respectively. Ammonia emissions were measured using wind-tunnels for 72 h. Cumulative NH3 emissions increased linearly with increasing urine N rate and emission factors ranged from 46% to 67% of urine urea-N applied and from 22% to 29% of total N applied. In experiment 2 and 3 the greatest reduction in cumulative NH3 emissions was obtained from pressure washing at 1 h which reduced emissions compared to the non-cleaned control by 91%. Pressure washing at 3 h reduced emissions by 80% while scraping after 1 h and 3 h reduced emissions by 78% and 54%, respectively. Farmers should be encouraged to clean their animal handling yards as soon as possible after use in order to maximise reductions in NH3 emissions from this source. (C) 2019 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available