4.3 Review

A review of microsampling techniques and their social impact

Journal

BIOMEDICAL MICRODEVICES
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10544-019-0412-y

Keywords

Microsampling; Skin biopsy; Blood sampling; Minimally invasive; Point-of-care device; Microneedle

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research (NHMRC) [APP1109749]
  2. University of Queensland Centennial Scholarship
  3. International Postgraduate Research Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional skin and blood sampling techniques for disease diagnosis, though effective, are often highly invasive and some even suffer from variations in analysis. With the improvements in molecular detection, the amount of starting sample quantity needed has significantly reduced in some diagnostic procedures, and this has led to an increased interest in microsampling techniques for disease biomarker detection. The miniaturization of sampling platforms driven by microsampling has the potential to shift disease diagnosis and monitoring closer to the point of care. The faster turnaround time for actionable results has improved patient care. The variations in sample quantification and analysis remain a challenge in the microsampling field. The future of microsampling looks promising. Emerging techniques are being clinically tested and monitored by regulatory bodies. This process is leading to safer and more reliable diagnostic platforms. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of current skin and blood microsampling techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available