4.7 Article

Enhanced methane production from acetate intermediate by bioelectrochemical anaerobic digestion at optimal applied voltages

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105261

Keywords

Bioelectrochemical anaerobic digestion; Anaerobic digestion; Applied voltage; Biomethane generation; Cyclic voltammetry; Acetate intermediate

Funding

  1. Gyeonggi Green Environment Center [17-06-3-10-12]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1D1A1A09059935, 2018R1A2B6001507]
  3. NRF Korea-India S & T Cooperation Program [2016K1A3A1A19945953]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016K1A3A1A19945953] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioelectrochemical anaerobic digestion of acetate, the main intermediate product in anaerobic digestion of methane, was evaluated at different applied voltages (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 V) in comparison to the control (without electrodes). At 1.0 V, the maximum methane yield (0.351 L CH4.g(-1) COD) and soluble chemical oxygen demand removal (83.6% SCOD) were observed with an acetate concentration of 2 g L-1. These values were 2.1 and 1.5 times higher than in the control reactor (0.167 L CH4.g(-1) COD and 54% SCOD), respectively. At the applied voltages of 0.5 and 1.5 V, lower efficiency of methane production was observed due to insufficient potential drive and high-voltage inhibition, respectively, although the methane yields were still higher than that of the control. The maximum current generation of 19.5 mA was obtained at 1.0 V condition, suggesting that a high electron transport rate was closely related to higher methane production. The lower Tafel slopes and polarization resistances indicated better bioelectrochemical anaerobic digestion performance with enhanced redox reactions and low electron transfer resistances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available