4.7 Article

Neurostructural Heterogeneity in Youths With Internalizing Symptoms

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages 473-482

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.005

Keywords

Cortical thickness; Heterogeneity; Internalizing; Structure; Volume; Youth

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [MH089983, MH089924, K99MH117274, R01MH120482, R01MH107703, R01MH113550, R01NS085211, R01MH112847, R01MH107235, R01MH11365, R01MH112070, R01EB022573]
  2. Dowshen Program for Neuroscience, Lifespan Brain Institute at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Young Investigator Award
  3. Center for Biomedical Computing and Image Analysis at Penn

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Internalizing disorders such as anxiety and depression are common psychiatric disorders that frequently begin in youth and exhibit marked heterogeneity in treatment response and clinical course. Given that symptom-based classification approaches do not align with underlying neurobiology, an alternative approach is to identify neurobiologically informed subtypes based on brain imaging data. METHODS: We used a recently developed semisupervised machine learning method (HYDRA [heterogeneity through discriminative analysis]) to delineate patterns of neurobiological heterogeneity within youths with internalizing symptoms using structural data collected at 3T from a sample of 1141 youths. RESULTS: Using volume and cortical thickness, cross-validation methods indicated 2 highly stable subtypes of internalizing youths (adjusted Rand index = 0.66; permutation-based false discovery rate p < .001). Subtype 1, defined by smaller brain volumes and reduced cortical thickness, was marked by impaired cognitive performance and higher levels of psychopathology than both subtype 2 and typically developing youths. Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion images not considered during clustering, we found that subtype 1 also showed reduced amplitudes of low-frequency fluctuations in frontolimbic regions at rest and reduced fractional anisotropy in several white matter tracts. In contrast, subtype 2 showed intact cognitive performance and greater volume, cortical thickness, and amplitudes during rest compared with subtype 1 and typically developing youths, despite still showing clinically significant levels of psychopathology. CONCLUSIONS: We identified 2 subtypes of internalizing youths differentiated by abnormalities in brain structure, function, and white matter integrity, with one of the subtypes showing poorer functioning across multiple domains. Identification of biologically grounded internalizing subtypes may assist in targeting early interventions and assessing longitudinal prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available