4.7 Article

Novel curcumin analogs to overcome EGFR-TKI lung adenocarcinoma drug resistance and reduce EGFR-TKI-induced GI adverse effects

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 1507-1514

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.02.003

Keywords

Curcumin; EGFR; Gastrointestinal tract; Lung adenocarcinoma; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Funding

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [NSC 102-2325-B-039-005, 100-2325-B-039-006]
  2. National Cancer Institute (USA) [CA177584]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA177584] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Curcumin (1) down-regulates the expression as well as phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in lung adenocarcinoma cells expressing gefitinib-resistant EGFR. Thirty-seven newly synthesized curcumin analogues including dimethoxycurcumin (2, DMC) were evaluated for their effects on EGFR expression as well as phosphorylation in two gefitinib-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cell lines, CL1-5 (EGFR(wt)) and H1975 (EGFR(L858R+T790M)). Based on the identified structure-activity relationships, methoxy substitution at C-3', C-4', or both positions favored inhibitory activity (compounds 1, 2, 5, 815, 17, 36), while compounds with more polar substituents were generally less active in both cell lines. Compound 36 with a fluorine substituent at C-6' and its protonated counterpart 2 did not lose activity, suggesting halogen tolerance. In addition, a conjugated linker was essential for activity. Among all evaluated curcumin derivatives, compound 2 showed the best inhibitory effects on both wild-type and mutant EGFR by efficiently inducing gefitinib-insensitive EGFR degradation. Compound 23 also reduced gefitinib-induced gastrointestinal damage in the non-transformed intestinal epithelial cell line IEC-18. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available