4.6 Article

Polymer complexes. LXXVIII. Synthesis and characterization of supramolecular uranyl polymer complexes: Determination of the bond lengths of uranyl ion in polymer complexes

Journal

APPLIED ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.5153

Keywords

molecular docking; molecular geometrical structures; polymer complexes; quantum chemical parameters; thermal decomposition analyses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The UO2(II) polymer complexes (1-5) of azo dye ligands 5(4`-derivatives phenylazo)-8-hydroxy-7-quinolinecarboxaldehyde (HLx) were prepared and characterized by elemental analysis, H-1 NMR, IR spectra, thermal analysis and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). The molecular geometrical structures and quantum chemical of the ligands (HLx) and their tautomeric forms (D and G) were calculated. Molecular docking between the HLx ligands and their tautomeric form with two receptors of the breast cancer (1JNX) and the prostate cancer (2Q7K) was discussed. From the histogram of the HOMO-LUMO energy gap (Delta E) and the estimated free energy of binding of the receptors of prostate cancer (2Q7K) and breast cancer (1JNX) for the ligands (HLx), it is observed that the Delta E values of the ligands (HLx) increases in the order HL2 < HL3 < HL4 < HL1 < HL5. The electronic structures and coordination were determined from a framework for the modeling of the formed polymer complexes. From the IR spectra of the polymer complexes, the symmetric stretching frequency upsilon(3) values of UO22+ were used for the determination of the force constant (FU-O (in 10(-8) N/)) and the bond length (RU-O ()) of the U-O bond by using Wilson, G. F. matrix method, McGlynn & Badger's formula and El-Sonbati equations. The plot of the bond distance r(U-O) (r(1), r(2), r(3), and r(t)) vs. upsilon(3) was showed straight lines with increase in the value of upsilon(3) and decrease in r(U-O).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available