4.8 Article

A high performance direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell - A green pathway for brown coal utilization

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 248, Issue -, Pages 679-687

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.104

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cells; Direct carbon; Brown coal; Efficient utilization

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51604132, 51764029, 91745203]
  2. Applied Basic Research Plan of Yunnan Province [2015FD007, 2017FD091, 2017FB085]
  3. Scientific Research Start-up Fund of Kunming University of Science and Technology of Introducing Talents [KKZ3201652004]
  4. Analysis and Testing Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology
  5. Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2014ZT05N200]
  6. NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund [U1601207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells (DC-SOFCs) are promising, all-solid-state, highly efficient and environment friendly power generating devices fueled by solid carbons. In addition, utilization of real-world coal as fuel for DC-SOFC is an attractive topic, however, they still yield poor performance due to negative effect of impurities in coal. In order to utilize brown coal to generate electricity efficiently and environmentally, here we report a highperformance direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell that enables a green pathway for brown coal utilization. The cell consists of nano Al2O3 doped yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) electrolyte supports and Ag-Gd0.1Ce0.9O2-delta as symmetrical composite catalyst electrodes. Fueled with raw brown coal and brown coal char at 850 degrees C separately, the cells can achieve maximum power densities of 211.4 and 221 mW cm(-2), respectively. Furthermore, a stable discharging voltage and platform with the fuel utilization of 61.5% are demonstrated when brown coal char fueled DC-SOFC is operated under a constant current of 0.1 A.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available