4.8 Article

jmzTab-M: A Reference Parser, Writer, and Validator for the Proteomics Standards Initiative mzTab 2.0 Metabolomics Standard

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 91, Issue 20, Pages 12615-12618

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01987

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerium fur Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
  2. Regierende Burgermeister von Berlin-inkl. Wissenschaft und Forschung
  3. Max Kade fellowship - Austrian Academy of Sciences
  4. de.NB1/BMBF [031L0108A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

mzTab 2.0 for metabolomics (mzTab-M) is the most recent standard format developed in collaboration by the Proteomics and Metabolomics Standards Initiatives including contributions by the recently founded Lipidomics Standards Initiative. mzTab-M is a redesign of the original mzTab format which was geared toward reporting of proteomics results and, as such, provided only limited support for metabolites. As a tab-delimited, spreadsheet-like format, mzTab-M captures experimental metadata, summary information on small molecules across assays, MS features as a basis for quantitation, and evidence to support the reporting of individual or feature group identifications. Here, we present the Java reference implementation for reading, writing, and validating mzTab-M files. Furthermore, we provide a web application for conveniently validating mzTab-M files by a graphical user interface, and a command line validator that accompanies the library. The jmzTab-M library, version 1.0.4 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3362151), is available at https://github.com/lifs-tools/jmzTab-m and from Maven Central at https://search.maven.org/search?q=jmztabm under the terms of the open source Apache License 2.0. The web application as well as the Python and R implementations are available at https://github.com/lifs-tools. The respective Web sites link to additional API documentation, as well as to usage examples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available