4.7 Article

Modified 2,4-diaminopyrimidine-based dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors as potential drug scaffolds against Bacillus anthracis

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 203-211

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.11.009

Keywords

Bacillus anthracis inhibition; Dihydrofolate reductase; Antibiotics; Antifolates; Antimicrobial agents

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH/NIAID [R01-AI090685]
  2. Sitlington Chair in Infectious Diseases [BIR-9512269]
  3. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education
  4. W.M. Keck Foundation
  5. Conoco, Inc
  6. OSU College of Arts and Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current Letter describes the synthesis and biological evaluation of dihydrophthalazine-appended 2,4-diaminopyrimidine (DAP) inhibitors (1) oxidized at the methylene bridge linking the DAP ring to the central aromatic ring and (2) modified at the central ring ether groups. Structures 4a-b incorporating an oxidized methylene bridge showed a decrease in activity, while slightly larger alkyl groups (CH2CH3 vs CH3) on the central ring oxygen atoms (R-2 and R-3) had a minimal impact on the inhibition. Comparison of the potency data for previously reported RAB1 and BN-53 with the most potent of the new derivatives (19b and 20a-b) showed similar values for inhibition of cellular growth and direct enzymatic inhibition (MICs 0.5-2 mu g/mL). Compounds 29-34 with larger ester and ether groups containing substituted aromatic rings at R-3 exhibited slightly reduced activity (MICs 2-16 mu g/mL). One explanation for this attenuated activity could be encroachment of the extended R-3 into the neighboring NADPH co-factor. These results indicate that modest additions to the central ring oxygen atoms are well tolerated, while larger modifications have the potential to act as dual-site inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available