4.7 Article

Concordance between the assessment of Aβ42, T-tau, and P-T181-tau in peripheral blood neuronal-derived exosomes and cerebrospinal fluid

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1071-1080

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.05.002

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment; Exosome; Biomarker; A beta; tau

Funding

  1. Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81530036]
  2. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project [31627803]
  3. Mission Program of Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals [SML20150801]
  4. Beijing Scholars Program
  5. Beijing Brain Initiative from Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z161100000216137]
  6. CHINA-CANADA Joint Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders [81261120571]
  7. Beijing Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [PXM2018_026283_000002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Neuronal-derived exosomal A beta 42, T-tau, and P-T181-tau have been demonstrated to be biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, no study has assessed the association of A beta 42, T-tau, and P-T181-tau between exosomes and CSF. Methods: This was a multicenter study with two-stage design. The subjects included 28 AD patients, 25 aMCI patients, and 29 controls in the discovery stage; the results of which were confirmed in the validation stage (73 AD, 71 aMCI, and 72 controls). Results: The exosomal concentrations of A beta 42, T-tau, and P-T181-tau in AD group were higher than those in aMCI and control groups (all P < .001). The level of each exosomal biomarker was highly correlated with that in CSF. Discussion: This study verified the agreement between CSF and blood exosomal biomarkers and confirmed that exosomal A beta 42, T-tau, and P-T181-tau have the same capacity as those in CSF for the diagnosis of AD and aMCI. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Alzheimer's Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available