4.6 Article

Attenuated activation of the unfolded protein response following exercise in skeletal muscle of older adults

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 11, Issue 18, Pages 7587-7604

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.102273

Keywords

aging; skeletal muscle; exercise; unfolded protein response; ER stress

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL TR000135, KL2 TR-000136]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [U24DK100469]
  3. NIH Director's Common Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sarcopenia is linked with impaired adaptive responses to exercise in aging skeletal muscle. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is an important intramyocellular molecular response pathway that is activated by exercise. The influence of age on skeletal muscle adaptive UPR in response to exercise, and the relationship to other key exercise-responsive regulatory pathways is not well-understood. We evaluated age-related changes in transcriptional markers of UPR activation following a single bout of resistance exercise in 12 young (27 +/- 5yrs) and 12 older (75 +/- 5yrs) healthy men and women. At baseline, there were modest differences in expression of UPR-related genes in young and older adults. Following exercise, transcriptional markers of UPR pathway activation were attenuated in older adults compared to young based on specific salient UPR-related genes and gene set enrichment analysis. The coordination of post-exercise transcriptional patterns between the UPR pathway, p53/p21 axis of autophagy, and satellite cell differentiation were less evident in older compared to young adults. In conclusion, transcriptomic analysis revealed an age-related decline in the adaptive UPR transcriptional response following a single bout of exercise that could contribute to impaired exercise responsiveness with age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available