4.7 Article

A scalable framework for large-scale 3D multimaterial topology optimization with octree-based mesh adaptation

Journal

ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.05.004

Keywords

Topology optimization; Multimaterial optimization; Large-scale computation; Adaptive mesh refinement; Multi-phase topology optimization

Funding

  1. NASA through the Transformative Tools and Technologies program [NNX15AU22A]
  2. NASA [797696, NNX15AU22A] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advancements in multimaterial additive manufacturing have the potential to enable the creation of topology optimized structures with both shape and material tailoring. However, multimaterial topology optimization methods that use Discrete Material Optimization (DMO) face three technical challenges for large-scale high-resolution problems: 1) the large-scale design space, since selection variables must be added for each additional candidate material; 2) the treatment of numerous sparse partition of unity constraints required in some DMO parametrizations; and 3) the multimaterial design space that has more local minima than an equivalent single material design space. This paper addresses these issues by presenting a parallel, scalable analysis and design optimization framework for multimaterial topology optimization that optionally uses local mesh refinement using semi-structured octree meshes. The advantages of this framework are demonstrated by showcasing its solution and design scalability and by efficiently solving large 3D multimaterial compliance-minimization problems with both isotropic and orthotropic material options on meshes with up to 329 million elements. For the largest case, the adaptive strategy is shown to achieve a compliance objective within 1.86% with roughly 1/4 the mesh size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available